Bloomberg Bank of America’s stock doesn’t seem to mind getting a $5 billion cash injection from Warren Buffett, but there is plenty of doubt out there about whether the bank got a good deal.
Along comes Doug Kass, never shy with the emails, who writes that it flat-out got fleeced (while admitting he’s long Bank of America stock):
By my calculation, Berkshire Hathaway is receiving an annual rate of interest on its $5 billion investment of about 10.5%, when incorporating the value of the attached call options on top of the 6% annual dividend on the preferred and the redemption premium of 5%.
Assuming BAC’s share price is at $7.72/share and a 45 vol, a 10-year option on 700 million shares of BAC that mature on Sept. 1, 2021, that are exercisable at $7.14/share is valued at about $3.40/share (times 700 million shares), or about $2.4 billion! Add another $250 million of redemption premium — that makes $2.650 billion in value (or immediate profits today!) incurring to Berkshire.
In other words, the current value of the warrants — taken over the 10-year period — provides an additional 4.5%-per-year return on top of the 6% dividend on the preferred, for a total cost of capital per year to Bank of America of nearly 10.5%. (Taken another way, deducting from the exercise price of $7.14/share the value of the call option ($3.40/share) means that Berkshire Hathaway may be paying, if exercised, less than $4/share for BAC!)
If Bank of America didn’t need the extra capital (as CEO Brian Moynihan reportedly told Warren Buffett), was the imprimatur of Berkshire Hathaway really that valuable?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)